The Strategic System Snapshot | Mini Results: Individual Summary
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Standards & Instructional Resources | ||||
Teaching | ||||
School Design | ||||
Leadership | ||||
School Support | ||||
Funding & Portfolio | ||||
Community Engagement |
HOW DO I INTERPRET MY RESULTS?
For each of the seven areas in The Strategic System Snapshot | Mini assessment, we show how your responses compare to “best practice.” Our definition of “best practice” is based on over 10 years of working with over 40 districts ranging from large urban and suburban districts to rural districts, state education agencies, and other education organizations that are leaders in their specialties. It is also based on a deep study of the research into what makes high-performing school systems succeed—even when they face limited resources and serve large numbers of students in poverty.
Read more about our vision for urban school system transformation in the District Design section of our website.
These results are not an evaluation of your district—they are the beginning of a strategic conversation. We hope they spark crucial discussions with your colleagues, and point to where more research and data may be needed. You can see a detailed report of your answers below.
A note about "Don’t Know": "Don’t Know" answers may lower your overall score in a particular section. If you marked "Don’t Know" for every statement in a section, that bar will not appear at all. Check your detailed report below for your "Don’t Know" count.
WHAT'S NEXT?
Learn What Your Peers Think: The Strategic System Snapshot | Mini is most useful when used in a group. For example, an entire leadership team can take the self-assessment as a part of the budgeting and strategic planning process. Each person’s answers are kept private, while the group result is visible to all. Learn more about setting up a group »
Understand the big picture: Learn more about our vision for transforming school systems:
- How School System 20/20 Became The Strategic System
- The Strategic System Snapshot Overview
- The Strategic System Snapshot: Assessments and Metrics
- The Get Started section of our website explains our vision for District Design, and it goes deep on School Design
Standards & Instructional Resources
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Access & Support | ||||
Curriculum & Instructional Resources |
Access & Support
System Conditions
- Do the instructional models for students with disabilities and English language learners focus on content in addition to learning needs?
- Does the district enable schools to provide targeted, integrated, equitable, and efficient social-emotional learning (SEL) support, services, and programs?
Curriculum & Instructional Resources
System Conditions
- Does the district provide school leaders and teachers with rigorous and coherent curricula, instructional resources, and assessments aligned to college- and career-ready standards?
- Does the district ensure that there are rigorous learning opportunities at all schools?
Teaching
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Hiring & Assignment | ||||
Professional Learning | ||||
Performance Measurement & Management | ||||
Career Path & Compensation |
Hiring & Assignment
System Conditions:
- Does the hiring timeline and process allow for schools to attract high-quality teachers?
- Do district policies encourage the most effective teachers to work in the highest-need schools?
- Does the hiring process result in high-quality teacher hires?
- Do district recruiting practices result in a pool of high-quality candidates?
- Do high-need schools have an equal or higher concentration of effective teachers?
Professional Learning
System Conditions:
- Does the district ensure professional learning around the common, cross-district learning needs of teachers?
- Does the district enable job-embedded professional learning for teachers?
- Does the district ensure teacher professional learning and/or support at critical career junctures, including induction, remediation, and transition to leadership, as well as support for additional certification in high-need areas?
- Does the district ensure that teachers receive high-quality, growth-oriented, job-embedded professional learning that supports school and individual needs?
- Do principals have a manageable span of review?
Performance Measurement & Management
System Conditions:
- Is the district's teacher evaluation system based on evidence and college- and career-ready standards?
- Is the teacher evaluation system anchored in evidence of student learning, and does it inform all other aspects of the human capital system?
- Are evaluation ratings an accurate assessment of teacher performance?
- Does the evaluation system result in the ability to differentiate teachers?
- Is the district’s teacher evaluation process and data used to support hiring, development, and assignment?
- Does the district retain an effective teaching force and encourage struggling teachers to leave the system?
Career Path & Compensation
System Conditions:
- Does the district leverage the whole value proposition to attract and retain top teacher talent?
- Does the district use its compensation system and career paths to leverage effective teachers to take on additional responsibilities and extend their reach to students or colleagues?
School Design
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Instruction | ||||
Teacher Collaboration | ||||
Talent Management | ||||
Time & Attention | ||||
Whole Child | ||||
Growth-Oriented Adult Culture |
Instruction
Practice and Resource Use:
- Do school leaders and teachers share a clearly articulated instructional vision that defines their approach to teaching and learning, includes subject-specific practices, and is informed by rigorous expectations for excellent teaching?
- Are instructional materials and instructional practice consistently rigorous for all students?
- Are teachers across the district regularly assessing student progress through formative and interim assessments, and are they using data to adjust instruction?
Teacher Collaboration
Practice and Resource Use:
- Do teachers have sufficient time scheduled for collaborative work and professional learning?
- Are teachers organized into balanced teams for the purpose of deepening understanding of standards and planning and improving instruction?
- Is professional learning supported by qualified and school-based content experts?
- Is teacher professional learning time used effectively?
- Are teachers receiving growth-oriented feedback and sustained coaching to improve instruction?
Talent Management
Practice and Resource Use:
- Do schools assign the most effective teachers to highest-priority areas?
- Do schools assign teachers to differentiated roles that increase the impact of highly effective teachers and enable additional support for new and struggling teachers?
Time & Attention
Practice and Resource Use:
- Have schools made cost-effective investments in group size as a lever for individual attention?
- Are master schedules aligned to ensure sufficient time for content mastery for all students?
- Do schools adjust supports, interventions, and student grouping frequently based on student data?
- Do schools support students with disabilities and English language learners (ELL) in a general education setting where possible?
Whole Child
Practice and Resource Use:
- Are schools building and maintaining an effective climate and culture based on shared expectations for values, behaviors, and routines that best support student learning?
- Are students known deeply by adults and other students in their school?
- Do schools ensure targeted, integrated, and efficient social and emotional services, including a deliberate approach to incorporating social-emotional competencies into student learning time?
Growth-Oriented Adult Culture
Practice and Resource Use:
- Do school faculty demonstrate a professional culture based on trust, commitment, shared accountability, and shared high standards around continuous learning of students and adults?
Leadership
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Hiring & Assignment | ||||
Professional Learning | ||||
Performance Measurement & Management | ||||
Career Path & Compensation |
Hiring & Assignment
System Conditions:
- Do district policies encourage the most effective leaders to work in the highest-need schools?
- Does the hiring timeline allow for schools to attract high-quality school leaders?
- Does the district strategically place its most effective principals in the highest-need schools?
- Does the recruiting and hiring process result in high-quality school leader hires?
Professional Learning
System Conditions:
- Does the district provide school leaders and other instructional experts with significant support and training throughout the school year?
- Does the district place strong leaders and promising potential leaders where they can have the greatest impact and growth?
Performance Measurement & Management
System Conditions:
- Does the district use a clear and rigorous, standards-based school leader evaluation system?
- Is the district’s principal evaluation data and process used to support compensation decisions, hiring, development, and assignment?
- Are school leader evaluation ratings an accurate assessment of school leader performance?
- Does the district retain effective school leaders and encourage consistently ineffective school leaders to leave the system?
Career Path & Compensation
System Conditions:
- Does the district leverage the whole value proposition to attract top school leader talent?
School Support
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated Planning Process | ||||
Differentiated Support & Accountability | ||||
Service Quality & Efficiency |
Integrated Planning Process
System Conditions:
- Does the school and district planning process and calendar allow a logical and integrated flow of all critical steps, from visioning to strategy to resource planning?
- Is data integrated using a system that is easy for administrators, teachers, and central office staff to access and use?
- Do teachers, administrators and central office staff use data to drive resource allocation and other decisions?
Differentiated Support & Accountability
System Conditions:
- Do school calendars and schedules provide adequate time and flexibility to meet student needs (or support strategic school designs)?
- Are there clear performance targets for which schools and school leaders are held accountable?
- Does the district provide sufficient support that varies based on school needs?
- Does the district outline a set of research-backed priorities for schools and guidance to support implementation?
Service Quality & Efficiency
Practice and Resource Use:
- Do central office budgeting practices focus on service quality, district priorities, and fiscal sustainability?
- Are central office departments held accountable for providing high-quality, coordinated, and cost-effective services to schools?
Funding & Portfolio
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Equity | ||||
Transparency | ||||
Flexibility | ||||
Utilization & Efficiency | ||||
Governance & Programming | ||||
Choice & Assignment |
Equity
System Conditions:
- Are the district's staffing and funding systems designed to consistently provide additional resources to students with greater learning needs?
- Does the district consistently provide additional resources to students with greater learning needs?
Transparency
System Conditions:
- Do school budgets provide a clear picture of how and where resources are allocated?
Flexibility
System Conditions:
- Do schools have the flexibility to vary resource use based on student, teacher, and school needs?
Utilization & Efficiency
System Conditions:
- Does the district make (or plan to make, if enrollment is changing) full use of existing facilities? Does the district have small schools either due to not using existing facilities or small buildings?
- Does the district have a clear and cost-effective plan for staffing small (<350) and under-filled schools?
Governance & Programming
System Conditions:
- Has the district aligned programs, grade configurations, and school size across school levels so that students who move through a specific feeder pattern or choice area experience continuity of programs across school levels?
- As permitted by state policy, does the district’s use of external school operators, if any, maximize local capacity and expertise within available resource levels?
Choice & Assignment
System Conditions:
- Is there equitable access to high-quality programs and innovative designs for students of all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds?
- How distributed are students of color and economically disadvantaged students across schools?
Community Engagement
Assessment |
Needs Most Improvement
|
Needs Improvement
|
Close to Best Practices
|
Best Practice
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Community Resources | ||||
Family Engagement | ||||
Stakeholder Engagement |
Community Resources
System Conditions:
- Does the district partner with or support schools in partnering with community or alternative providers?
- Do schools partner with community or alternative providers?
Family Engagement
System Conditions:
- Does the district encourage and support schools to partner with parents around meeting student learning goals?
- Do schools partner with parents around meeting student learning goals?
Stakeholder Engagement
System Conditions:
- Does the district engage with the local community around strategic resource planning?